I don't know about you, but I never tire of reading these articles. This is from an Alfred area newspaper following their 57-0 drubbing at the hands of St. Bonaventure led by Weenie. He gained 310 yards and scored 4 touchdowns in this game. Another article about this game referred to him as "brilliant". Who wouldn't love to read that about their beloved grandfather?
Maybe this cool (almost fall-like) morning brought this to mind today. Seriously it is so much fun to Google Weenie. (Well, be careful to include the Flynn part maybe with Olean so you don't get any nasty surprises in the results). If you haven't done so while you are wasting time on the internet, I strongly recommend it.
Paula mentioned the porch of the kitchen at 206 Tompkins street from the last post. Yes, I remember that porch too. I think Nanny had flowers out there we were sometimes allowed to water with one of those watering cans that had a very long skinny curved neck. I always loved to do that. And the bubbles, of course! Nice, comforting memories. Ahhhhh........
Friday, July 25, 2014
Friday, July 18, 2014
A House is Not a Home...is it?
Recently we went to Erie and stopped in Olean on our way. Jim drove by Nanny and Weenie's house for me at 206 Tompkins Street. This is what it looks like today:
Looks pretty much the same. The fence wasn't there in those days but otherwise nearly the same as I remember. I expect I'm not the only one of us that has fond memories of this place, but the very first thing that comes to my mind when I think of it is the stale smoke smell. And even though the words "stale smoke smell" generally do not make me smile, somehow that olfactory memory is a fond one. The other general impression I remember is one of darkness or muted light. I don't remember lots of sunlight streaming in and the furniture was dark wood with that richly colored Oriental carpet softening the patter of little feet.
A little bit of research indicates that house was built around 1930 which means it was fairly new in house years while we were visitors. It didn't have a "new" feel to me. It is still rental property today. I can't help but wonder why Nanny and Weenie rented all those years.
Nanny and Grampie's house on Haskell Street in Gloucester looked like this in recent years:
It has changed hands several times since Nanny and Grampie lived there. It also changed its number: from 34 to 24. My memories of this place are hazier--we didn't visit often but it seemed relatively big to me and more open that the Olean house. Records seem to indicate it was built around 1900 so it had lived a pretty significant life before we descended upon it. Nanny and Grampie did not live on Haskell Street in the 1930 census but did so in the 1940 census. At that time, they reported they lived in the same house 5 years earlier. These records also state they owned the house, worth $3500 in 1940. Anyhow, every time we go to Gloucester we drive by it and I smile at the memories.
Judy shared the news of her impending move after many years on Alice Street. Since it is the home the boys grew up in, I'm sure there will be many memories encased within those walls. That house will hold those memories always just as the Olean and Gloucester houses did for our parents and for us. In that regard, I'm not sure the song lyrics have it quite right. "A house is not a home" is 100% true but can you deny the faint smiles you generate when you see these pictures? If the walls could speak........
Good luck to Judy, Patrick and the boys. Empty nest feelings might be somewhat softened by your new surroundings. I hope so.
Looks pretty much the same. The fence wasn't there in those days but otherwise nearly the same as I remember. I expect I'm not the only one of us that has fond memories of this place, but the very first thing that comes to my mind when I think of it is the stale smoke smell. And even though the words "stale smoke smell" generally do not make me smile, somehow that olfactory memory is a fond one. The other general impression I remember is one of darkness or muted light. I don't remember lots of sunlight streaming in and the furniture was dark wood with that richly colored Oriental carpet softening the patter of little feet.
A little bit of research indicates that house was built around 1930 which means it was fairly new in house years while we were visitors. It didn't have a "new" feel to me. It is still rental property today. I can't help but wonder why Nanny and Weenie rented all those years.
Nanny and Grampie's house on Haskell Street in Gloucester looked like this in recent years:
It has changed hands several times since Nanny and Grampie lived there. It also changed its number: from 34 to 24. My memories of this place are hazier--we didn't visit often but it seemed relatively big to me and more open that the Olean house. Records seem to indicate it was built around 1900 so it had lived a pretty significant life before we descended upon it. Nanny and Grampie did not live on Haskell Street in the 1930 census but did so in the 1940 census. At that time, they reported they lived in the same house 5 years earlier. These records also state they owned the house, worth $3500 in 1940. Anyhow, every time we go to Gloucester we drive by it and I smile at the memories.
Judy shared the news of her impending move after many years on Alice Street. Since it is the home the boys grew up in, I'm sure there will be many memories encased within those walls. That house will hold those memories always just as the Olean and Gloucester houses did for our parents and for us. In that regard, I'm not sure the song lyrics have it quite right. "A house is not a home" is 100% true but can you deny the faint smiles you generate when you see these pictures? If the walls could speak........
Good luck to Judy, Patrick and the boys. Empty nest feelings might be somewhat softened by your new surroundings. I hope so.
Monday, July 7, 2014
Have you ever thought about how the weekend concept came to be? I
hadn't so I was intrigued by the following written by Marie Wells of the
New England Historic Genealogical Society:
It’s a steamy summer weekend, so what do you do?
You toss the kids (and/or the grandkids) into the car and head for the
shore. Time to get some respite from the heat with those cooling ocean
breezes, and to commune with nature for a few
hours. Ah, but when you get there, you find that several thousand of
your closest friends and neighbors had the same idea. With perhaps
three square feet of sand to call your own and the water as crowded as
the sole working elevator in a high rise office
building, you make the best of a fine tradition that goes back many,
many decades.
Or does it?
For the first couple of centuries after the
Pilgrims first anchored the Mayflower in Provincetown Harbor, work was
life, and life was work. No thought was given toward leisure time; in
fact, in Puritan Massachusetts, the one day that work
was forbidden was to be spent at the meeting house for the Sabbath
services – which lasted all day. Only after the Civil War when
manufacturing and huge factories became the way of life for hundreds of
thousands of people, many of them immigrants, was there
something – though still paltry - called “leisure time.” The
well-to-do had enjoyed leisure time for years, and built large, ornate
“cottages” in resort areas such as Newport, Rhode Island, to get away
during the hot summers in style. But little thought
was given to whether the working class even deserved time off and/or
access to recreational amenities.
One man changed all that, a man still held up as a
symbol of overwhelming capitalism, but a man who knew a good thing when
it swam up and bit him in the posterior.
In 1909, Edsel Ford publicly announced, "Every man
needs more than one day a week for rest and recreation....The Ford
Company always has sought to promote [an] ideal home life for its
employees. We believe that in order to live properly
every man should have more time to spend with his family." And in 1926,
Henry Ford made his son’s words reality: he shut down all his
factories for all of Saturday and Sunday, thus creating The Weekend. No
one had done it before, but Ford had cars to sell
and knew that people would by them only if they had leisure time in
which to enjoy them. What a concept!
How interesting the tie between your family's beloved Fords and leisure
weekend time! We are looking forward to upcoming weekend
festivities on Long Island when our nephew Brad will get married. This event points to the changing nature of the
concept of weekends and leisure time. This wedding will be held on a Sunday. When we were growing up, this
just wasn't done--the phrase "non-traditional" didn't even cover such an
idea. Catholics weren't allowed Sunday marriages so as not to interfere with church services. Sundays were held as sacrosanct. Businesses were ALL closed.
You went to church and spent time with your families on Sundays.
Period.
As we all have seen, Sundays are no longer off limits for
working, shopping, alcohol or weddings! It seems the weekend pendulum
is swinging back to the earlier days when it made no difference what day
of the week it was for workers, shopkeepers, liquor stores or young
couples seeking to be married.
As a child, I really did not enjoy Sundays. I was supremely bored, so I
still enjoy the freedom that Sundays now bring. It's still a weekend
day, but with the added benefit of open shops and family weddings!!! As you may know, Amy plans to be married on a Sunday next summer so we are also becoming part of the pendulum swing. WooHoo!
Thursday, July 3, 2014
BAM! Walter Brown 1849-1908
A few posts ago, I mentioned that Walter Brown was bedeviling me in terms of "closing the door" on his life. Walter was Grampie Brown's younger brother. Unlike Grampie (William S. Brown), Walter was born in the United States. Though an early census record indicates he was born in Albany County, a later census indicates he was born in Michigan (where his sisters settled). I am more inclined to believe he was born in New York State since that earlier census record was recorded much closer to the actual event. I have the family pretty well documented and I don't believe they were in Michigan in 1849, but I could be proven mistaken one day in the future.
Walter apparently worked with metal--his occupation was listed as tinsmith and metal laborer over the years. He came from a long history of blacksmithing and tinsmithing seems not too far removed from that. He married Sarah Armstrong and lived in the Buffalo NY area. Sarah and Walter had two children William and Maria. Again, not easy to locate yet another William Brown in Buffalo but the search will continue.
This case was cracked when I found Grampie Brown living with Sarah after Walter died. I'd had this death notice but wasn't sure it was the right Walter until I found that little tidbit.
Further evidence was located in a gravestone picture located somewhat by accident while following Ancestry.com leads:
This picture wouldn't have made sense without knowing a little about Walter's wife Sarah. It's in Holy Cross Cemetery (presumably Buffalo though I'm not sure--ready for another road trip to Buffalo, Paula?)
This is a case where several small clues lead me to conclude that our Walter Brown died in 1908: the gravestone combined with the newspaper obituary combined with the census record. None of these, standing alone, would lead to such a conclusion but TOGETHER they paint another picture of one of our family members. It brings me great satisfaction to hunt these clues down and try to match them up. I'm embarrassed to admit how many of these clues have been right in my files all along but that's a different story for another day.
Walter apparently worked with metal--his occupation was listed as tinsmith and metal laborer over the years. He came from a long history of blacksmithing and tinsmithing seems not too far removed from that. He married Sarah Armstrong and lived in the Buffalo NY area. Sarah and Walter had two children William and Maria. Again, not easy to locate yet another William Brown in Buffalo but the search will continue.
This case was cracked when I found Grampie Brown living with Sarah after Walter died. I'd had this death notice but wasn't sure it was the right Walter until I found that little tidbit.
Further evidence was located in a gravestone picture located somewhat by accident while following Ancestry.com leads:
This picture wouldn't have made sense without knowing a little about Walter's wife Sarah. It's in Holy Cross Cemetery (presumably Buffalo though I'm not sure--ready for another road trip to Buffalo, Paula?)
This is a case where several small clues lead me to conclude that our Walter Brown died in 1908: the gravestone combined with the newspaper obituary combined with the census record. None of these, standing alone, would lead to such a conclusion but TOGETHER they paint another picture of one of our family members. It brings me great satisfaction to hunt these clues down and try to match them up. I'm embarrassed to admit how many of these clues have been right in my files all along but that's a different story for another day.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



